August 11, 2003 -- OUR
immediate missions in the War Against Terror aren't enough to win a
decisive victory.
Yes, those missions - preventing as many attacks as we can,
killing or capturing terrorists, destroying terrorist organizations
- are essential goals, but they focus on surface tumors while
ignoring the cancer beneath.
The security environment will improve as Saddam, Osama and their
most virulent supporters are killed. Eliminating terrorist
operatives, masterminds and supportive dictators brings vital
results. But we will never reduce Islamic terrorism to nuisance
level unless we address the greater evil behind the deadly strikes.
One cannot have much sympathy with Osama bin Laden, whose vision
of a vengeful god thirsty for infidel blood is utter blasphemy. Nor
could any decent human being excuse the acts of terror committed by
his followers, or by Palestinian suicide bombers or by any of the
morally crippled youths who murder in the name of their religion.
But it is possible to recognize that the majority of the
lower-rank terrorists whose lives their overlords throw away so
callously have been set up psychologically by the corruption and
hopelessness of their societies.
And those societies have been wrecked by Arabs and other Muslims
to whom we cling as partners and whom we even imagine to be our
friends.
From North Africa through Arabia's sands to Kashmir, those with
whom we do business, upon whom we rely for advice and assurances of
stability, with whom we have dinner and play golf - these are the
very creatures who have stolen everything they could steal from
their own people, who have ravaged educational systems, looted
treasuries, corrupted institutions, tortured and murdered populist
opponents and turned once-promising states into financial and moral
basket cases.
Corruption and hypocrisy may be elements of the human condition,
but Arab elites have developed them to a superhuman extreme. If they
could, they would steal the air itself and charge the poor for
breathing.
The little guy hasn't got a chance in the Middle East, and
America should always be on the side of the little guy. Instead,
we've given Arab fat cats a license to kill, steal - and betray us.
Even the Saudi delight in funding anti-Western murderers and the
regional habit of allowing terrorists to slip through phony dragnets
amount to symptoms, not the disease itself.
Yes, we want that 20-year-old terrorist dead or imprisoned. But
we are naive and self-defeating if we simply continue to pick off
terrorists in ones and twos, or even in hundreds, without
recognizing that the very people whom we have embraced in Middle
Eastern societies have created the environment in which terror
thrives. And those same pals of ours have done their best to deflect
all blame onto us.
We have looked away as the few destroyed the chances of the many,
as the greedy ground the impoverished into the dirt. Now we are
paying a price not for what we have done to Muslims, but for what we
have failed to do.
Until the recent war against Saddam's regime, we never stood up
for freedom in the Arab world.
We have consistently tolerated or supported those who said
the right things to us, who signed the oil contracts, who promised
to keep things quiet - and who made a mockery of every value our
nation professes.
Our reward? Terror. But the truth is that we should be astonished
that there is so little anti-American terrorism, given how
long, how dishonestly and how virulently our supposed friends
preached their theology of blame to local audiences.
As our political and business partners bankrupted their countries
and created stagnant societies careless of human wastage, they
accused us. They stole, and said we did it.
They bought mansions in the south of France, in London and Aspen,
then told their people that Egyptians and Palestinians lived in
hovels because America had stolen the wealth due to them - with the
help of Zionist conspirators.
Our willingness to trust those who smile and pick up the dinner
tab in Riyadh or Washington has been a bipartisan sin - and a
national disgrace. Hillary Clinton embraced Madame Arafat and
Pakistan's peerlessly corrupt Benazir Bhutto. Both Presidents Bush
refused - and continue to refuse - to acknowledge the vicious
strategic agenda of the Saudi royal family.
Administrations from both parties bribed Hosni Mubarak with
billions of dollars in aid while his cronies robbed Egypt into
destitution. From the Straits of Gibraltar to the Himalayas, we have
sold our nation's soul to second-rate devils for small change.
Future historians will regard our groveling at the feet of Saudi
bigots and whoremongers as the equivalent of down-market strippers
dancing for drunkards' tips.
The present administration has done an admirable job of waging
the immediate, tactical fight against terrorism. But we will never
achieve an enduring strategic victory until we recognize how cheaply
Democrats, Republicans and corporate America have sold out to those
who damn us from their pulpits behind our backs, insisting that the
only hope for Islam is to destroy Israel and America.
Why isn't there a serious bipartisan outcry to expose Saudi
misdeeds? Why do we get nothing but pro forma,
made-for-the-microphone complaints from both sides of the aisle?
Because both political parties are horrified at the thought of
the Saudis revealing what they know about us, about the sweetheart
deals, the retainers-for-nothing, the inflated contracts and the
appalling shabbiness of politicians, businessmen and lobbyists
willing to look away from human suffering, injustice and the deepest
roots of terror in exchange for a game of tennis with Prince Bandar.
We have unleashed a great wave of change in the Middle East. But
we will never make decisive progress against terror until we address
the underlying causes - and stop supporting the smiling thieves who
rob their own people then ask us out to lunch.
For all the blood on his hands, Osama has higher ethical
standards than our Arab "friends."
Ralph Peters is a retired Army officer and the author of
"Beyond Terror: Strategy in a Changing World."