Monday, March
15, 2004
The Dark Night of Spirit
The victory of the Socialist Party in Spain and its probable withdrawal
from an active alliance with the United States in the Global War on Terror
is a decisive victory for the forces of freedom everywhere -- although this
is not immediately apparent. It establishes the iron linkage between
Eurosocialism and militant Islam, indeed demonstrates for all the world to
see the subordination of the Euroleft to the Global Jihad. The last claim of
Marxism-Leninism to the leadership of history is gone. They are the liveried
flunkeys of Sheik Osama. Long may they enjoy it.
The events in Spain show it is no longer possible to embrace both
Eurosocialism and national independence; Eurosocialism and national defense;
Eurosocialism and survival. The two have become incompatible states. You can
have one but not the other. And since men must live and live to breathe
free, Eurosocialism must in the end pass into the night chained to its boon
companions.
The task before the United States and its allies is to redouble its
efforts in the War on Terror. It will soon become apparent who the Islamists
prefer to blackmail, who the Islamists prefer to intimidate; which countries
Islamism will attempt to dominate. And which live free. The more pointed the
contrast the better. In this fight, America's greatest ally will be the
global Jihad itself. As the terror network is squeezed so will it infest the
countries which have given it succor. Every nation and territory which has
surrendered to the Jihad has chosen for itself unending misery and
abjection. Those who drink from the cup of Osama must endure it to its last
bitter dregs.
Although many commentators have excoriated the Spanish electorate for its
capitulation to terror, we must never forget that the slightly smaller half
decisively rejected it. These we honor and the rest we pity.
Dark Night of Spirit 2
There's an old saying that one should be careful of wishes because they
might come true. The capitulation of Spain to Al Qaeda's terrorist offensive
may momentarily gladden the Eurosocialists -- but only momentarily.
Eurosocialism is ironically premised on a wall of free security,
traditionally provided by the United States, behind which they can pursue
utopianism. But the practical effect of the Socialist victory will be to
open Europe's southern borders to more terrorist infiltration. First, the
Socialist leader Zapatero is unlikely to pursue an agressive anti-terrorist
policy. He will begin by withdrawing Spanish forces from Iraq. Second, the
events of March 11 and the subsequent election have divided Spain as no
other event in recent history and has created all manner of political
cracks through which an ill-wind may whistle. Third, Spanish access to US
intelligence will inevitably be degraded. It will not be cut off, but it
will not be what it was.
These circumstances create an objective weakening in the Continental
defensive structure. France, already at a heightened state of alert, now
faces the prospect that its southern neighbor will make a separate peace
with the jihadis. For while Aznar's party might have withstood
another bombing, Zapatero's, after all their promises, cannot. If the
Socialists cannot take their program of appeasement to its logical
conclusion then they must face the very Islamic bombings which they told the
electorate their election would prevent.
The appeasement which so amuses the French may not be so funny when
played by the Spaniards. For Spain, in concert with America and France,
shared the watch of North Africa. And since that is where many Al Qaeda have
moved, as the Madrid train bombing carried out by North Africans proves,
Europe will find their relative danger increased far more greatly than the
Americans, who can comfortably lose the Spanish contingent in Iraq. The loss
of a solid Spain, while an annoyance to America is a catastrophe for Europe.
Iraq is far from America but Spain is close to France.
In the end, the very nature of the War on Terror ultimately means
that Europe needs America more than America needs Europe. The global
jihad means that attacks on Europe can be planned and launched from
geographical locations far beyond the reach of their defense forces. That
could be ignored while Europe remained convinced that it would not be
targeted. But now the doubt grows. And if the contingency eventuates,
neither France nor Spain have the mobility or the means to pursue their foes
into the uttermost reaches of Central Asia, the deserts of Africa or the
teeming stews of the Southwest Asia. That deficiency can only be addressed
by a sustained program of European defense spending --- and it will not.
Zapatero has cast away the very thing that he may need and which he can
neither afford nor beg.
Eurosocialism, by hitching its wagon to the fortunes of militant Islam
has put itself at it's mercy. That is the definition of surrender, whose
fine print the Continent will soon be familiar with. A disarmed, politically
correct and supine Eurosocialist society can only exist where other free men
guard their borders. By dismissing the guardians and capitulating to the
jihadis the Eurosocialists have struck at the very root of their own
existence. Lenin once remarked that capitalists would sell him the noose he
would use to hang them. But that was before Stalin
poisoned him.
| Saturday,
March 13, 2004
The Ichneumon Wasp
The
European left has reacted to news that the suspects in the March 3
Madrid train massacre were Moroccans by blaming the United States,
representing it as the vengeance of Al Qaeda which Spain brought on
itself for helping America in Iraq. It was natural that Osama, who
remembers the fall of the Abassid caliphate well, should recall how the
Mongols erected a tower of skulls before every city sacked before
sending word ahead that any resistance would suffer the same fate. And
so the Spanish victims caused their own deaths by being tardy in
submission. The Left is now the messenger boy of Islamofacism. They know
their place.
In the early 1990s, cadres of the Philippine Communist New People's
Army went to Mindanao to establish a "tactical alliance" with Muslim
separatists. They brought their Maoist Red Books and some light
machineguns, thinking to overawe the Islamic yokels with worldly wisdom
obtained at the University of the Philippines and a few hoary tips from
Soviet training manuals. Instead they found a hard core of thousands who
had trained in Afghanistan and the Balkans, who scoffed at the rusty
Communist machineguns and whose petrodollars made the paltry Euroleft
donations seem like chump change. It was a moment of revelation. Dan
Darling at
Regnum Crucis describes a similar moment during the early meetings
between ETA and Hamas. The home team had brought their pathetic assets
to the table.
The members of ETA said that although they had left in their
sufficient arsenal a few hundred packages of dynamite, stolen a little
earlier in two gunpowder magazines from France, they feared that it
had begun to spoil. In spite of that, Hamas accepted the offer.
In return they were dazzled by a cave of wonders. The Islamists took
ETA members to Afghanistan on forged Belgian passports, where they were
trained in the use of MANPADS and given a few weapons via Greek
freighters and a pleasure boat. That earnest was obviously convincing
because somewhat later, the ETA sent 80 militants to Iraq for further
training. The pecking order had been established and the coordination
structured accordingly. In practice the relation between militants, even
in the European and American Left, is governed by threat and
intimidation. It is unnoticeable to the outer fringes of the Movement
but grows increasingly more severe as one approaches the "committed"
core. Among sympathizers in the media, entertainment and academic
industries, obedience is largely enforced by social pressure or economic
sanction. Closer in the pretenses are dropped and
operational rules prevail. At the Central Committee level, as
David Horowitz knows, decisions are enforced under penalty of death.
Mercy is shown, within the Marxist IRA, by whether your kneecap is blown
out from the front or the back. The arrival of the Islamists in the
West, like a new gang arriving in town, has changed the dynamic
considerably. They are given a wide berth by the Left, not merely out of
a shared hatred for America, but out of fear -- pure operational fear.
When the adnan or call to prayer is
sounded from the bell tower at the state-funded University of Miami
(hat tip:
Little Green Footballs) to the approval of Leftist claques, there is
a more than mutual admiration involved. People remember
Salman Rushdie and the BBC Islamic prayer rooms have a certain
preventive quality about them. The moribund Left knows who is boss and
is selling the only thing they have remaining: access to media and
cultural institutions, which suits the Islamofascists just fine. A
division of labor has been established in which the Left provides the
paralyzing injection on Western society leaving the jihadis a
clear field within which to operate.
Steven Jay Gould, in arguing for the existence of natural evil,
could find no better analogy than the ichneumon wasp, after which the
monster in Alien was modeled, and which not coincidentally
describes Islamofascism and its Leftist helpers.
The ichneumon, like most wasps, generally live freely as adults
but pass their larva life as parasites feeding on the bodies of other
animals, almost invariably members of their own phylum, the Arthropoda.
The most common victims are caterpillars (butterfly and moth larvae),
but some ichneumons prefer aphids and other attack spiders. Most host
are parasitized as larvae, but some adults are attacked, and many tiny
ichneumons inject their brood directly into the eggs of their host.
The free-flying females locate an appropriate host and then
convert it into a food factory for their own young. Parasitologists
speak of ectoparasitism when the uninvited guest lives on the surface
of its host, and endoparasitism when the parasite dwells within. Among
endoparasitic ichneumons, adult females pierce the host with their
ovipositor and deposit eggs within. (The ovipositor, a thin tube
extending backward from the wasp's rear end, may be many times as long
as the body itself.) Usually, the host is not otherwise inconvenienced
for the moment, at least until the eggs hatch and the ichneumon larvae
begin their grim work of interior excavation.
Among ectoparasites, however, many females lay their eggs
directly upon the host's body. Since an active host would easily
dislodge the egg, the ichneumon mother often simultaneously injects a
toxin that paralyzes the caterpillar or other victim. The paralyzes
may be permanent, and the caterpillar lies, alive but immobile, with
the agent of its future destruction secure on its belly. The egg
hatches, the helpless caterpillar twitches, the wasp larvae pierces
and begins its grisly feast.
Since a dead and decaying caterpillar will do the wasp larvae no
good, it eats in a pattern that cannot help but recall, in our
inappropriate anthropocentric interpretation, the ancient English
penalty for treason — drawing and quartering, with its explicit object
of extracting as much torment as possible by keeping the victim alive
and sentient. As the king's executioner drew out and burned his
client's entrails, so does the ichneumon larvae eat fat bodies and
digestive organs first, keeping the caterpillar alive by preserving
intact the essential heart and central nervous system. Finally, the
larvae completes its work and kills its victim, leaving behind the
caterpillar's empty shell. Is it any wonder that ichneumons, not
snakes or lions, stood as the paramount challenge to God's benevolence
during the heyday of natural theology?
This thing must never reach the stars. |
|